Eight radios drifted for two months. Nobody noticed — until they noticed all at once.
A modeled-scenario walk-through of how a small midstream operator running 84 remote wellsites watched eight radios fail simultaneously after a quiet 9-week degradation window. This is what predictive operational intelligence would have caught — and what conventional SCADA didn't.
The setup
A regional midstream operator we'll call "Trinity Energy" runs 84 remote wellsites across three Texas counties. Each site has a Schneider SCADAPack 333 RTU communicating over licensed UHF radio to a single master station near the company's gas-processing plant. The radios were installed in 2019. The master station was upgraded in 2023 to a Freewave FGR2-PE. Comms had been "rock solid for two years," per the SCADA team.
Trinity's SCADA system — built on AVEVA Wonderware — surfaces communication status per site as a boolean: green dot for "comms OK," red dot for "comms FAIL." Operators see the dots on the L1 area overview. Anything between green and red is invisible.
What the radios were doing
Every radio in the field publishes diagnostic telemetry alongside its primary process data — RSSI (received signal strength), SNR (signal-to-noise ratio), retry count, and forward error correction (FEC) statistics. These are pollable via the same comms link the SCADA already uses. They are not displayed on Trinity's HMI. They live in the historian, unread.
Starting in early March of the modeled scenario, eight sites began showing the same pattern: RSSI drifting -1 to -2 dB per week, with no change in retry count or link status. Comms still passed. The boolean stayed green. The trend was visible only by looking at the historian numbers — which nobody was looking at.
What was actually happening
The eight affected sites shared a common feature: they all routed through a single repeater tower at the highest-elevation point on Trinity's range. That repeater's UHF antenna had developed a slow leak in the coax weatherproofing — a hairline crack in the connector boot from a hailstorm the previous September. Water was gradually corroding the antenna feed. Return loss was climbing 0.5 dB per week. Effective radiated power was dropping proportionally. Sites farther from the repeater felt it first — closer sites had margin to spare.
Timeline of the drift
The cost
Modeled, but representative of real operations of this size:
Total modeled cost: ~$70K direct, plus the PHMSA exposure (which is rarely a fine but is always a regulatory-record entry that follows the operator).
What Aevus would have surfaced
Aevus ingests the radio diagnostic telemetry alongside the process data. Three signals in the modeled timeline that the platform would have flagged:
Week 5 — fleet-wide pattern detection
By week 5, six sites had drifted in the same direction by 4-6 dB over the same 5-week window. Independent site monitoring missed this because each individual drift was small. Aevus's fleet-wide correlation engine would have flagged "six geographically-clustered sites are degrading at the same rate" as a Severity-2 advisory, recommending an inspection of the shared infrastructure (the repeater tower).
Week 7 — escalation as flickers appear
The brief sunset outages on Site 47 would have triggered an automatic escalation from Severity 2 to Severity 1: an actively-degrading repeater path with confirmed outage events. Aevus would have notified the on-call supervisor by SMS with an actionable summary and a recommended dispatch window — Tuesday or Wednesday daylight, before the next weather front predicted for the following weekend.
Week 8 — explainable recommendation, not just an alert
Aevus's alert content would have included the correlated evidence: the six-site drift pattern, the recent hailstorm weather event, the historical-tower antenna-replacement schedule (last replacement: 2019, recommended at 5 years for the model in use), and a confidence estimate. Not "something is wrong" — "the repeater tower antenna is degrading; here's why we think so; here's what to do."
The modeled outcome
With predictive intelligence on RSSI/SNR/retry, the maintenance dispatch happens on a Tuesday afternoon. The corroded connector is replaced before it fails. No 2:47 AM calls. No custody-transfer dispute. No PHMSA-reportable event. Total spend: ~$1,200 for a planned field visit. Total avoided cost: ~$70K plus the regulatory record.
Why the conventional SCADA missed it
Trinity's SCADA isn't bad — it's typical. Three specific blind spots, each common across the industry:
- Boolean comms status. The HMI shows "green" or "red." There is no "yellow" for drifting. Operators with hundreds of sites can't visually scan numerical RSSI trends; they need the system to do that for them.
- Per-site monitoring, not fleet-wide. Each site's drift was small. The pattern only emerges when you correlate across sites. Trinity's SCADA renders per-site dashboards; it doesn't compute fleet-wide synchronized-degradation signals.
- Reactive maintenance posture. The radio team operates on a "fix on fail" budget. Predictive dispatch isn't a budgeted activity. That's not a technology gap — it's an organizational one. But the technology has to exist before the budget can shift to use it.
What this case study is, and isn't
What it is: a modeled walk-through of a real failure pattern, with modeled but representative cost figures, showing the decision-support gap that predictive operational intelligence closes.
What it isn't: a paid testimonial from a deployed customer. Aevus is pre-revenue. The first paid pilots are in active conversation as of mid-2026. When we have measured outcomes from a real deployment, we'll publish those — clearly labeled as measured, with the customer's permission, with the customer's name on the case study.
We chose to publish this modeled case study because the underlying pattern is real (verified by the Aevus advisory board's combined field experience across midstream, water, and electric utilities), and because evaluators need to see the decision-support gap clearly to evaluate whether closing it is worth a pilot conversation.
If this pattern is familiar.
If your operations team has watched a slow drift turn into a 2 AM phone call — and you want to be the operator who catches the drift, not the one who gets the call — that's the conversation we're built for.
Related Articles
Bands, degradation, and predictive failover for field radios.
Every site, radio path, and degrading link in one view.
Watch AI catch degradation that classic SCADA misses.
Ready to see how this applies to your operation? Start a pilot conversation — no commitment, no field changes.

